fluid (CSF) can lead to dorsal root ganglion (DRG) pathology. The pathology is minimal to moderate in most cases; clinically silent in affected animals; and characterized by mononuclear cell infiltrates, neuronal degeneration, and secondary axonopathy of central and peripheral axons on histopathological analysis. We aggregated data from 33 nonclinical studies in 256 NHP and performed a meta-analysis of the severity of DRG pathology to compare different routes of administration, dose, time course, study conduct, age of the animals, sex, capsid, promoter, capsid purification method, and transgene. DRG pathology was observed in 83% of NHP that were administered AAV through the CSF, and 32% of NHP that received an intravenous (IV) injection. We show that dose and age at injection significantly affected the severity whereas sex had no [effect].
Below from Parkin GT LGE slidedeck
| Potential Safety Issue | Probability of Occurrence | Impact | Rationale for Potential Issue | Proposed De-risking Strategy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Immunogenicity (Capsid) | High | Medium |
Immune response to AAV therapy is common. Can effect efficacy and safety depending on the extent of the response. Development of excessive immune responses non-clinically can be program limiting. Cytotoxicity due to cell mediated destruction of transposed cells has been observed in some GT. In most cases toxicity is transient with a greater impact on long term transgene expression (efficacy) than as a safety liability There is a hypothesis by other group; formation of vector-antibody complexes (immunogenicity) could activate complement through the classic pathway or activate innate immunity through Fc-dependent uptake in antigen-presenting cell | Translatability of immune response observed in animals is not always clear. Excessive immune response resulting in toxicity should be evident in in vivo studies. The tropism of the capsid and the target tissue (CNS, muscle, liver etc.) should be taken into account when designing safety endpoints for in vivo studies. |
| Immunogenicity (Transgene) | Middle* | High | Immune response to transgene expression is common. Can effect efficacy and safety depending on the extent of the response. Cytotoxicity due to cell mediated destruction of transposed cells has been observed in some GT. | |
| Cellular stress/ cytotoxicity | Low | High |
Chronic activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR) due to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress can result in exacerbation of inflammation and programed cell death. In some cases activation of the UPR has been observed in gene therapy due to capsid processing and transgene expression. When transfected the dorsal root ganglia appears to be sensitive to these effects – the relevance of this risk to AAV GT is still theoretical AAV vectors activate the UPR pathways through three major UPR axes, endoribonuclease inositol-requiring enzyme-1 (IRE1α), activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6) and PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) during its infection (PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53845) The IRE1 also activates the IKK leading to NF-κB upregulation. The activated NF-κB further activates the inflammatory genes thus inducing an inflammatory response (Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011 Mar 1; 108(9): 3743–3748) | If suspected as a potential source of toxicity the Activation of the UPR can be assessed via gene expression assays. Upregulation of the pathway signaling genes IRE-1, PERK, and ATF6 could be assessed in vitro or potentially in vivo via ddPCR or rtPCR |
| Genotoxicity | Very Low | High | Insertion of the transgene DNA into host chromosome has the possibility of being tumorigenic | AAV in general have very low insertion rate. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity studies have not been historically required for GT programs – FDA is no longer concerned about insertional mutagenesis for AAV based GT |
Study population
| Counterargument | |
| HV | for most CGT trials, the benefit-risk profile is not acceptable for healthy volunteers. |
Type of gene therapy
| Inherited genetic diseases | Cancer | Antisense oligonucleotide | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Glybera for Lipoprotein lipase deficiency | Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) for ALL | Eteplirsen for DMD | |
| Use of vector | o | O | X |
| 종양성 조직 내부에 직접적으로 사멸 유전자를 전달하거나, 항원을 발현시켜 면역세포가 신생물을 인식하고 공격하는 것을 촉진. | |||
| Use of vector | Example | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Inherited genetic diseases | Gene transfer/editing | O | Glybera for Lipoprotein lipase deficiency |
| Luxturna for biallelic RPE65 mutation-associated retinal dystrophy | |||
| Exon skipping (Antisense oligonucleotide) | X | Eteplirsen for DMD | |
| Cancer | 종양성 조직 내부에 직접적으로 사멸 유전자를 전달하거나, 항원을 발현시켜 면역세포가 신생물을 인식하고 공격하는 것을 촉진. | O | Kymriah (tisagenlecleucel) for ALL |
| Paper | condition | animal | Vector | administration | Efficiency | Efficiency measurement | Phenotype 개선 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 Bengtsson | DMD | Mouse | CRISPR/Cas9 | AAV | Non-tissue specific | IM | 45% trasduction, 8-9% correction (muscle) | Deep sequencing | Not available |
| 2017 Chan | WT | Mouse | Gene transfer | AAV | Non-tissue specific | IV | 82% transduction (DRG neurons) | Immunostaining | Not available |
| 2017 Kagiava | CMT1X | Mouse | Gene transfer | LentiV | Schwann cell-specific | Intrathecal | 약 50% expression (Schwann cell) | Immunostaining | Improved |
| Toolgen | CMT1A | Mouse | CRISPR/Cas9 | MFN | Nerve 부분선택적 (?) | Intraneural | 11% correction (nerve) | ? |
Units (dose and transgene expression)
| example | 예 | 종 | tissue | Quantification Method | transgene 구분 within individual? | transgene 구분: group level | Unit | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dose (=titer) | Prevail | NHP | Brain | 필요없음. | vg/g brain | |||
| Prevail | mice | Brain | vg | |||||
| Tak's biology | mice | Brain | vg/inj | |||||
| (Rocha et al. 2015, PMID) | Mice & rat | Brain | Genome copies/mL | |||||
| [Exposure, Biodistribution] vector genome copy levels, | Prevail NHP biodistribution study | NHP | Brain | - vector genome copy levels | ||||
| 거 Gene 이라 보면 됨. (전체, viral gene 임, target gene 아님) | = Vector copies/ug genome DNA = Vector copies/ ug DNA tissues Vector genome | |||||||
| 제 viral mRNA | Tak's biology | mice | Brain | shire ID tag Q-PCR | 구분함 | 미보고 | ||
| Prevail | 미보고 | |||||||
| (Rocha et al., 2015) | 미보고 | |||||||
| (Rockenstein et al., 2016) | ||||||||
| (Sardi et al. 2013, PMID) | ||||||||
| Tak's biology | mice | Brain | qRT-PCR | 미구분 | ||||
| 제 target mRNA | HA-tagging 시 가능하지 않나? | |||||||
| target Protein expression | (Rocha et al. 2015, PMID) | Mice & rat | Brain | IF | 미구분 | vehicle (ie AAV-GFP) treated control animal group 과 차이를 비교함으로써 transgene level 유추해냄. | % of vehicle treated control animal | |
| Brain | WB | 미구분 | ||||||
| Prevail NHP : | NHP | Brain | an antibody-based automated assay, SimpleWestern | 미구분 | ||||
| (Rockenstein et al. 2016, PMID 27126635) | mice | brain | IF | 미구분 | No report | No report | ||
| (Sardi et al. 2013, PMID) | IF | 미구분 | 미보고 | 미보고 | ||||
| Tak's biology | mice | Brain | ELISA | 미구분이라함 | ||||
| Ootake plan | CSF | |||||||
| GBA GT NHP (snbr) | NHP | brain | HA-tagging → IHC | 구분 | ||||
one vector copy (vector genome) represent one ‘capsid’ (virus particle).
[PHARMACOLOGY]
| Binding | examples | Binding site | Structure of the inhibitor | Conformational change of the [target] | Vmax | Km | Kd |
|---|
Uncertain Spans
| location | transcription | uncertainty |
|---|---|---|
| Top yellow-highlighted paragraph | (continuation describing DRG pathology meta-analysis across 33 nonclinical AAV studies in 256 NHP) | First sentence is mid-paragraph; the preceding sentences are on 20240722_184756. |
Probability of Occurrence for Immunogenicity (Transgene) | Middle* | The literal token reads Middle* with an asterisk; preserved as printed. |
Toolgen Vector cell | MFN | Three-letter code for the vector used by the Toolgen CMT1A study; legibility OK but the abbreviation is not expanded on this capture. |
[PHARMACOLOGY] Binding header row | (header only) | Only the column header row is visible; the body of the Binding table continues on 20240722_184802. |