(Holden, 2018 #1123)
MDS-UPDRS scores increased in a linear fashion over 5 years in patients with de novo PD. MDSUPDRS total scores increased an estimated 4.7 points per year, Part I scores increased 0.99 points per year, and Part III scores increased 2.4 points per year.
| Mean ± SD | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline, N = 362 | Month 12, N = 318 | Month 24, N = 312 | Month 36, N = 317 | Month 48, N = 240 | Month 60, N = 107 | |
| Age, y | 61.3 ± 9.8 | |||||
| Sex: Women, % | 33.7 | |||||
| Treatment with dopaminergic medications, % | 0.0 | 57.9 | 83.3 | 90.9 | 95.4 | 90.7 |
| MDS-UPDRS score | ||||||
| Total | 31.75 ± 12.99 | 38.33 ± 15.96 | 42.34 ± 17.31 | 45.78 ± 18.89 | 52.00 ± 22.43 | 54.89 ± 23.36 |
| Part I | 5.38 ± 3.97 | 6.74 ± 4.60 | 7.30 ± 4.84 | 8.06 ± 5.34 | 9.38 ± 6.02 | 9.84 ± 6.31 |
| Part II | 5.67 ± 4.13 | 7.27 ± 4.93 | 7.84 ± 5.25 | 8.57 ± 5.42 | 10.04 ± 6.64 | 10.73 ± 6.92 |
| Part III | 20.72 ± 8.85 | 24.11 ± 10.27 | 26.70 ± 11.26 | 28.37 ± 12.06 | 31.38 ± 12.84 | 32.54 ± 14.65 |
| Part IV | NA | 0.36 ± 1.20 | 0.60 ± 1.61 | 0.87 ± 1.85 | 1.34 ± 2.30 | 1.96 ± 2.51 |
Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation; MDS-UPDRS: Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale; NA, not applicable.
TABLE 2 Sample Size Estimations for the Detection of Disease Modification in a Hypothetical 1-Year Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial
| Symptomatic Change in Treated Group | Mean Change in MDS-UPDRS Part III in Treated Group at 1 Year (Treatment Effect, % Attenuation)* | Total Sample Size [Per Group] |
|---|---|---|
| Slowing of progression | +4 (-2.35, 37%) +2 (-4.35, 69%) | 480 [240] 142 [71] |
| Halting of progression | 0 (-6.35, 100%) | 68 [34] |
| Reversal of progression | -2 (-8.35, 131%) -4 (-10.35, 163%) | 40 [20] 28 [14] |
Abbreviations: MDS-UPDRS: Movement Disorder Society-Sponsored Revision of the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale.
*Calculations were based on assumptions of 90% power; a mean ± standard deviation progression of 6.35 ± 6.66 points on MDS-UPDRS Part III for the untreated (control) group, as observed in Parkinson’s Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) participants who were not taking dopaminergic medication at 1 year; and a standard deviation of 9.00 points on MDS-UPDRS Part III for the treated group, as observed in PPMI participants who were taking dopaminergic medication at 1 year. Sample size was allocated equally to the treatment and control groups and assumed that data from all participants were valid and usable.
Milestone-based approach
| Baseline clinical | Baseline clinical | Milestone 도시 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Milestone-based approach vs disease progression | M. Brumm, A. Siderowf, T. Simuni, C. Caspell-Garcia, L. Chahine, T. Foroud, V. Arnedo, A. Reimer, C. Tanner, K. Poston, D. Weintraub, S. Hutten, K. Kieburtz, K. Marek, C. Coffey. A Milestone-based approach to monitoring disease progression in Parkinson's disease [abstract]. Mov Disord. 2021; 36 (suppl 1). https://www.mdsabstracts.org/abstract/a-milestone-based-approach-to-monitoring-disease-progression-in-parkinsons-disease/. Accessed May 15, 2023. | AD/PD 2023 Raphael T.Gerraty's poster RNA | |
Takeda UPDRS analysis
- Goals
- approaches to identify items or factors within the UPDRS that are most sensitive to disease progression, or more broadly, to discuss endpoints that may be useful for internal decision-making.
- Topics
- Analytic approach to identify factors that show the highest rate of progression (using UPDRS and/or other variables) and factors that demonstrate close correlation with rate of DaT scan progression.
- intercurrent addition of dopaminergic therapy
- time to event / progression milestone endpoints
- Resources
- LINK is here
MoCA (Montreal Cognitive Assessment)
- 7 subscores: visuospatial/executive (5 points, ie this is more focused on rather than memory!); naming (3 points); memory (5 points for delayed recall); attention (6 points); language (3 points); abstraction (2 points); and orientation (6 points). One point is added if the subject has 12 years of education.
- MoCA declines only about 0.5 points over 5 years in PD (PPMI 2019 annual meeting)
- A score of 26 or over is considered to be normal. In a study, people without cognitive impairment scored an average of 27.4;
- cf: PR001A of Prevail’s NCT04127578 recuits MOCA<14
- https://www.mocatest.org/faq/ The cut-off score of 18 is usually considered to separate MCI from AD .
- https://www.mocatest.org/faq/.
| Range | Average | |
|---|---|---|
| Full score | 30 | |
| Normal | 26-30 | 27.4 |
| MCI | 18-25 | 22 |
| Mild AD | 11-21 | 16 |
| Moderate AD | 10-17 | |
| Severe AD | <10 |
- MCID, minimal clinically important difference;
| (Investigators, 2021 #1753) suppl3, eTable 1.2nd-1st: for MoCA is from Wu et al. Occup Ther Int. 2019 Apr 14;2019:2517658 | 1.2 |
| (Wu, 2019 #2802) |
|
- conversion between MoCA and MMSE
- (Lawton, 2016 #1547) 아래 Steenoven 방법과 저자 (Lawton) 방법 둘다 좋음.
TABLE 1. Conversion from MoCA to MMSE using the equipercentile method with log-linear smoothing using our datasets and compared to that from van Steenoven and colleagues
| MoCA Total Adjusted | Equivalent MMSE Total (From the van Steenoven Article) | Equivalent MMSE Total (Internal Data Conversion) |
|---|---|---|
| 6 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 18 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 20 | |
| 21 | 21 | |
| 22 | 22 | |
| 22 | 22 | |
| 23 | 23 | |
| 24 | 24 | |
| 25 | 24 | |
| 26 | 25 | |
| 26 | 26 | |
| 27 | 26 | |
| 28 | 29 | |
| 29 | 30 | |
| 30 | 30 |
MoCA was adjusted for the years of education. Scores that are in the shaded boxes are derived from extrapolated data.
Uncertain Spans
| location | transcription | uncertainty |
|---|---|---|
| Top Holden 2018 table left rows | (Levodopa OFF / Levodopa ON / Other PD meds banded sub-rows including Mean (SD), (Min, max) for both Total score and Part III score across 6 timepoints) | The full Levodopa OFF/ON sub-table at the very top of the page is partially cut off above the body crop and the leftmost row labels have a coloured pink/red highlight band; numeric body cells are read as printed. Several body cells have OCR-ambiguous decimal commas (e.g. “(13.0, 70.0)”) preserved verbatim. |
| MoCA → MMSE conversion table | top six rows of “MoCA Total Adjusted” column | The leftmost MoCA Total column header is partly clipped at left edge of the source table; values for the column are not visible in this capture. The shaded box rows (rows ≤ 16 / 17 in the van Steenoven column) preserve the source highlight via empty MoCA-Total cells. |
| Milestone-based approach right cell | AD/PD 2023Raphael T.Gerraty's poster and RNA | The right column appears to combine a poster reference and a stand-alone “RNA” tag from the source; the spacing of 2023Raphael is rendered as a single token in the source text. |